Unfair contract terms
The FSA has powers under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (the Regulations) relating to the fairness of terms in standard form consumer contracts.
These web pages bring firms up to date with the latest developments in our work on this and point to information that helps firms with their existing obligations to comply with the Regulations.
| Latest updates |
|---|
Barclays Bank PLC [PDF] Our latest undertaking is from Barclays Bank PLC regarding their Fixed Rate Savings Bond contract. This undertaking shows that variation terms in contracts should be carefully drafted to ensure they are compliant with the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. A firm should also consider our May 2005 Statement of Good Practice on 'Fairness of Terms in Consumer Contracts'. In particular, where a firm includes a variation clause in its terms and conditions, valid reasons should be included to explain why the term may be varied. We would expect a 'valid reason' to be, amongst other things, clearly and unambiguously defined. Paragraph 3.5 of the Statement also provides that a term 'which confers an unnecessarily broad discretion on the firm or could be used to the advantage of the firm, rather than the consumer, is likely to be unfair'. Similarly the firm should consider whether or not the terms provide for notice to be given to the consumer of the change and if the consumer can freely dissolve the contract should they reject the proposed variation. The firm was fully cooperative in amending the term. |
Undertaking: Jarvis Investment Management Plc [PDF] Our latest undertaking is from Jarvis Investment Management Plc regarding their Terms of Business. This undertaking shows that variation terms in contracts should be carefully drafted to ensure they are compliant with the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. In particular, where a firm includes a variation clause in its terms and conditions, valid reasons should be included to explain why the term may be varied. Similarly the firm should consider whether or not the terms provide for notice to be given to the consumer of the change and if the consumer can freely dissolve the contract should they reject the proposed variation. The firm was fully cooperative in amending the term. |
Published undertakings
We have published details of the undertakings from firms to amend their unfair terms and conditions. As stated in UNFCOG, as part of their risk management, firms that have not themselves given an undertaking or been subject to a court decision should remain alert to undertakings or court decisions concerning other firms, since these will be of potential value in indicating the likely attitude of the courts, the FSA, the Office of Fair Trading or other qualifying bodies to similar terms or terms with similar effects.

